|
Volume
XIII, No. 36
October 31, 2005
|
| TOP
STORY
Voters in OHIO and CALIFORNIA
go to the polls next week to determine who will draw electoral district
lines. But some people say these elections are more about the states' Republican
governors than political gerrymandering.
|
SNCJ
Spotlight
Govs loom large
as CA, OH seek redistricting changes
Next week, voters in OHIO and CALIFORNIA will head to the polls to decide
whether to make their states the latest to take the power to draw electoral
districts out of the hands of lawmakers and place it instead with independent
panels. While supporters of both measures frame them as referendums on
"gerrymandering" and partisan politics, many observers believe the measures
will actually sink or swim not on their merits, but rather on how voters
feel about each state's beleaguered governor. |
The Ohio measure, Issue 4, was drafted after last November's
presidential election. State Republicans were feeling good then, as Ohio
proved to be the pivotal bloc that swung the election to George W. Bush.
The party also had strong majorities in both legislative chambers and a
popular governor who is the great-grandson of a former U.S. president.
But that was then, this is now. The GOP has since been dogged by a scandal
that forced Gov. Bob Taft to plead guilty to state ethics violations, leading
to Taft paying a fine and issuing a formal apology to Buckeye State citizens.
The real penalty, however, has come in the court of public opinion, where
a recent survey showed Taft's approval rating has plummeted to an abysmal
15 percent.
That backlash has also fueled support for Issue 4, which would establish
an independent, five-person commission with a legal mandate to draw competitive
Congressional and state legislative districts. Analysts there say that
could lead to as many as 10 newly competitive Congressional districts,
many of them currently manned by incumbent Republicans. It could also significantly
threaten a dozen of the "safe" districts the GOP currently controls in
the Buckeye State Legislature.
That possibility has led supporters to frame Issue 4 as, in the words
of Stephen Brooks, Associate Director of the Bliss Institute of Applied
Politics at the University of Akron, "a way to stop the abuse of power"
in state government. Issue 4's proponents have made Taft the poster child
for that perceived abuse, spending as much advertising time on criticizing
him as in discussing the actual measure.
Meanwhile, in California, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) has also made
changing redistricting a major part of his "Year of Reform," noting often
that none of the 153 contested seats in the 2004 California general election
changed party hands. He has thrown his weight behind Proposition 77, which
would place the task of drawing district maps into the hands of a three-person
panel of retired judges. Voters would then have to ratify those maps, which
would make the Golden State unique among those with district commissions.
A recent study from the conservative-leaning Rose Institute at Claremont
McKenna College projects that Prop 77 would produce 10 highly competitive
congressional districts and 15 competitive legislative seats, a sharp difference
from the current standards of only five competitive legislative districts
and no competitive Congressional House districts.
But Schwarzenegger has also endured a sharp decline in his once enormous
popularity, with his current approval rating hovering in the low 40s. While
it once seemed that he could virtually will people to support his proposals,
a year of ceaseless battles with labor unions and Democratic lawmakers
has tarnished his image and raised questions as to whether he still has
the cache to convince voters to follow his lead, particularly on an issue
many see as a highly partisan attempt to whittle away at the Democratic
power base in the state Legislature.
Such is the concern among Prop 77 supporters that Steve Poizner, the
campaign's chairman, says the group has recently begun to separate itself
from the governor, framing the measure instead as a referendum on the legislature.
"We're putting together a strong case that it's not about the governor,
it's about reform," he says. That, as might be expected, has Schwarzenegger's
opponents practically giddy.
"Schwarzenegger in the beginning looked like he could sell ice to Eskimos,"
says California Democratic Party spokesperson Bob Mullholland of the governor's
recent declining poll numbers. "Now, he's making people so angry, he can't
sell two-by-fours to carpenters."
It remains to be seen if he can sell voters on changing redistricting
either in California or Ohio. Schwarzenegger recently gave Issue 4 his
endorsement, drawing the ire of its predominantly Republican opposition.
The governor has also drawn his share of heat from the national GOP and
the White House, neither of which is happy about the possible loss of Republican-held
seats in Congress.
But Schwarzenegger has remained typically nonplussed by his critics.
He defended his endorsement of the Ohio measure in a public quasi-debate
with Prop 77 opponents last week, saying he knew the Buckeye State GOP
was "mad as hell" at him, but that "what was good for the goose is good
for the gander. We are doing redistricting here in California. I think
[they] should also do it there because [district lines] were also drawn
by politicians."
The controversy over lawmakers drawing their own district lines --
in essence choosing their voters rather than having voters choose them
-- is nothing new, nor are efforts to reform the system. Part of the problem
is that federal law requires districts to be contiguous, roughly equal
in population and to not dilute the political strength of minority populations.
That is not exactly a specific directive, leaving states to figure it out
for themselves how to achieve those goals. While most states still allow
lawmakers to draw the lines, a dozen states have commissions with first
and final authority over redistricting, and at least 12 more considered
such systems this year (see "Redistricting Reform Revolution" under Politics
and Leadership in the Oct. 3, 2005 State Net Capitol Journal).
But not everyone is sold on the concept that having independent commissions
automatically makes for a better system.
"In terms of the number of lawsuits being filed that challenge the lines
that are drawn, there really is no difference between commission states
and legislative states," says Tim Hodson, executive director for the Center
for California Studies in Sacramento. "There is also no strong evidence
that commission plans are significantly more competitive or representative.
Some are, but many aren't."
Hodson also questions Prop 77s voter-approval element, asking "If the
judges on the panel draw the lines correctly in the first place, why does
the issue have to go back to the voters? I think that just opens the door
for the side that feels slighted to create mischief."
Tim Storey, who tracks election issues for the National Conference of
State Legislatures, also notes that commissions vary greatly in their makeup
and design, further clouding the overall view of their effectiveness.
"There is no easy answer to this situation," he says. "There are 12
different states with redistricting commissions, and they have 12 different
ways of going about their job. Many of them are also very partisan."
Storey says he also finds it curious that California's Proposition 77
would create the nation's smallest redistricting commission (along with
ARKANSAS) in its most populous state.
"Based on a population of 36 million, that means each of these judges
would in essence be responsible for deciding districts for 12 million people,"
he says.
Dr. Michael McDonald, an assistant professor of government and politics
at George Mason University in VIRGINIA who has worked on redistricting
efforts in several states, supports having independent commissions draw
boundaries, but agrees they provide no certainty of producing the results
reformers are looking for.
"The success of a commission really depends on the rules you set up
and the state doing the redistricting," he says.
That success is also dependant on the same partisan wrangling seen
in non-commission states. Case in point is ARIZONA, where in the late 1990s
an independent commission was given the power to create "fair and competitive"
districts. But when that commission drew some districts with large Latino
populations -- ostensibly to give a historically underrepresented group
a stronger political voice -- some Democratic and Latino groups complained
that the real intention was to water down their strength in other districts.
Both the Department of Justice and the courts torpedoed the plan.
There are other bugaboos as well, most notably the human trait to cluster
in like-minded groups. Schwarzenegger's enthusiasm notwithstanding, most
redistricting experts doubt that anyone really expects liberal havens like
San Francisco to suddenly vote a straight Republican ticket.
"When you get right down to it, a large element of the non-competitiveness
we're seeing in America is social sorting," says Bruce Cain, a redistricting
expert from the University of California, Berkeley. "People are moving
into areas with people like themselves, in terms of race or income. You'd
have to explicitly undo that homogeneity to create more competitiveness."
According to the polls, both Proposition 77 and Issue 4 are facing tough
battles on Nov. 8, with voters about evenly split on both. Regardless of
what happens, Cain doubts the controversy over how the lines are drawn
will be over in either state.
"The problem is that people have different expectations about the outcomes,"
he says. "You can change the process, but you can't take away the controversy."
(NEW YORK TIMES, GOVERNING, SACRAMENTO BEE, LOS ANGELES TIMES, SAN DIEGO
UNION TRIBUNE, TOLEDO BLADE, THE ROSE INSTITUTE)
-- Compiled by RICH EHISEN
TOP
OF PAGE
The
Week in Session
States in Regular
Session: DC, MA, MI, OH, PA, US, WI
States in Veto Session:
IL
States in Special Session:
PA "a"
States in Recess: CA,
NH, NY, NJ
Special Sessions in Recess:
CA "a", DE "a", OK "a"
States Projected to Adjourn:
CT "a"
States Adjourned in 2005:
AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, HI, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, LA, MD,
ME, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NM, NV, OK, OR, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT,
VA, VT, WA, WV, WY
States in Special Session
Adjourned in 2005: AK "a", AL "a", CT "a", CT "b", GA "a", KS "a",
ME "a", ME "b", MN "a", MO "a", MS "a", MS "b", MS "c", MS "d", MS "e",
NM "a", NV "a", SD "a", TX "a", TX "b", UT "a", VT "a", WI "a", WV "a",
WV "b", WV "c", WV "d"
Letters
indicate special/extraordinary sessions
Compiled
By JAMES ROSS| Data current as of 10/28/05 | Source: State
Net database
TOP OF
PAGE
|
Budget & taxes
BARBOUR MAKES CONSERVATIVE AID APPEAL:
MISSISSIPPI Gov. Haley Barbour (R) paid a visit to the nation's
capital last week seeking support from Congress and the president for his
hurricane recovery plan. One thing the plan has going for it is that it's
considerably less ambitious than the one LOUISIANA Gov. Kathleen Blanco
(D) pitched for her state a few weeks ago, a point Barbour himself made
at a news conference before he headed off to Washington. "I want to put
a stop to the idea that we're talking about $200 billion in relief for
the devastation of Hurricane Katrina," he said. "There's simply no case
to be made for that high an amount from the federal government." Barbour
said his state only needs about $38 billion in federal aid. What's more,
he said about half of that sum could come from the Magnolia State's share
of the $62 billion Congress has already set aside for Katrina relief. But
Barbour also took the opportunity to take the federal government to task.
One of the main objectives of his plan is to help up to 50,000 residents
who did not have flood insurance -- because it wasn't required -- rebuild
their homes. As justification for that proposal, Barbour offered, "The
federal government determined what the flood zone is" and that residents
"who lived outside that zone relied on the federal government to their
detriment." (CLARION-LEDGER [JACKSON], SUN HERALD [BILOXI])
"VIEW TAX" REVOLT IN NEW HAMPSHIRE:
Last year, the assessed value of NEW HAMPSHIRE resident David Bischoff's
home, a one-room cabin with no electricity, running water or phone service
located in the small, rural town of Orford, rose sevenfold, from $22,900
to $162,900. The sole reason for that dramatic increase, according to the
town property revaluation records, was Bischoff's view, a sweeping panorama
of the surrounding hills. The near certainty that Bischoff would also see
a corresponding spike in his $500 annual property taxes led him to join
other Orford residents last month in voting to reject the property revaluation,
placing the town at the forefront of a growing protest movement against
the so-called "view tax." Some state officials maintain that tax assessments
have always taken into account factors that enhance a property's market
value, such as a waterfront location or a nice view. But State Agriculture
Commissioner Steve Taylor conceded that a flood of vacation-home buyers
and retirees into rural communities like Orford is inflating valuations.
"There are too many dollars chasing too few views and they're running the
values way up," he said. Some residents fear the "view tax" is threatening
the states rural character by forcing farmers to sell to developers and
pricing residents out of homes their families have owned for generations.
Others have more immediate concerns. John Chandler, for instance, a retired
engineer and former state legislator who lives in the town of Hill, doesn't
feel he should have to pay more for his distant view of the White Mountains
because he has no control over it, pointing out that it's obscured by air
pollution a lot of the time. On top of that, Chandler is legally blind.
(ASSOCIATED PRESS, BOSTON GLOBE)
BUDGETS IN BRIEF: In response to
rising fuel prices, CONNECTICUT lawmakers assembled in special session
unanimously passed a bill last week expanding the state's energy assistance
program for needy families by $23.8 million and providing incentives for
energy-saving measures like weatherizing windows and installing energy-efficient
home heating equipment. Gov. M. Jodi Rell (R) is expected to sign the bill
into law (ASSOCIATED PRESS, BOSTON GLOBE). * MICHIGAN's GOP-controlled
Senate approved a plan last Tuesday -- over Democratic objections -- to
cut business taxes by $1 billion over 6 years, and reduce them by $1.4
billion more if state tax revenues exceed the rate of inflation plus 1
percentage point. The legislation was sent to the Republican-led House,
which passed its own tax package in August (ASSOCIATED PRESS, LANSING STATE
JOURNAL). * Budget analysts in LOUISIANA reported on Oct. 21 that the state
ended last fiscal year (June 30) with a $250 million surplus. But that
news isn't much comfort to state lawmakers who must figure out how to plug
a $1.5 billion hole in the state budget created by Hurricanes Katrina and
Rita (DALLAS MORNING NEWS). * Last Monday, President George Bush declared
FLORIDA a major disaster area, freeing up federal resources for victims
of Hurricane Wilma (MIAMI HERALD). * Testimony began last week in a trial
over WYOMING's new school funding system. A coalition of education associations
and school districts contends that the system -- adopted in 2002 after
the state's old funding model was declared unconstitutional -- still doesn't
provide adequate money for hiring and training teachers and maintaining
school facilities (BILLINGS GAZETTE, ROCKY MOUNTAIN NEWS [DENVER]). * A
superior court in NEW HAMPSHIRE has ruled that the property tax at the
heart of the Granite State's education funding system is unconstitutional.
The ruling came in connection with a lawsuit brought by several property
owners alleging that assessments made in 2002 varied significantly from
town to town, resulting in an unfair division of the tax burden (CONCORD
MONITOR).
-- Compiled by KOREY CLARK
TOP OF PAGE
Politics &
leadership
STATES TAKE ON 527s: Nonprofit
political groups known as 527s gained national prominence last year, as
a result of the efforts of Swift Boat Veterans for Truth and MoveOn.org
to sway the 2004 presidential election. But campaign finance watchdogs
are now focusing attention on 527s they say are attempting to illegally
influence state races. A report by the nonpartisan Center for Public Integrity
indicates that the Republican State Leadership Committee (RSLC), one of
the nation's largest 527s, was fined $20,000 by the LOUISIANA State Board
of Ethics for failing to disclose the source of funds for advertisements
in the state's 2003 race for attorney general. The RSLC was also fined
$10,000 by the NORTH CAROLINA State Board of Elections for violating that
state's $4,000 limit on party contributions, with a $100,000 donation to
the state GOP. And PENNSYLVANIA regulators are looking into a $480,000
RSLC contribution in the Keystone State's 2004 attorney general's race.
But it isn't just Republican-backed 527s that have been getting dinged
by regulators. In MINNESOTA, election officials slapped a group called
the 21st Century Democrats with a record $400,000 fine for failing to file
proper campaign disclosure forms. Leah Rush, director of state projects
for the Center for Public Integrity, said, "People are registering these
groups to be outside the [state campaign finance] system." The groups,
which are named after a section of the federal tax code, actually came
into existence after the passage of the federal McCain-Feingold Act three
years ago, which barred political parties and PACs from raising "soft money,"
cash supposedly used for "voter education" and "issue advocacy" rather
than to directly advocate for the election or defeat of a particular candidate.
According to Brian McDonald, a spokesman for Pennsylvania's Department
of State, the problem is that "Essentially, all the laws that govern 527s
are at the federal level." Apparently, state regulators are figuring out
how to work around that problem. But federal agencies are also stepping
in. The Internal Revenue Service, for example, is planning to investigate
all 527s to determine whether they are improperly registered as nonprofit
organizations. (STATELINE.ORG)
POLITICAL AD RATES SOAR IN GOLDEN STATE: In
the final weeks leading up to CALIFORNIA's Nov. 8 special election, a single
30-second advertising spot during the popular TV drama "Desperate Housewives"
in the Los Angeles market has been selling for as much as $110,000. No
political campaign has actually paid for such a slot. But political consultant
Bill Carrick -- who is working on a campaign to defeat Proposition 77,
dealing with redistricting -- says he doesn't recall six-figures ever being
asked for a political ad in the state. Furthermore, campaigns have shelled
out $15,000 for slots during "Monday Night Football," more than double
what the campaign for then-gubernatorial candidate Arnold Schwarzenegger
paid during the 2003 recall election -- and triple what one state Senate
candidate paid last year. "It's one of these perfect storms," said Carrick.
"There's a new [television] season. There's a new [local] ratings process
in some markets where stations are charging more because they say they
have a more accurate reflection of ratings. And there are long-term campaigns
being run by the pharmaceutical industry and the [union-backed] alliance."
On top of that, ballot initiative campaigns are not protected by federal
rules requiring broadcasters to sell ad time to political candidates at
the "lowest unit charge" prior to an election. Basically, the ballot campaigns
have found themselves battling with national retailers for ad time at whatever
price the market will bear. In some cases, the campaigns are even being
charged a premium if their ad necessitates "bumping" a regular advertiser.
"I think this will be the most expensive election cycle in California history,"
said Garry South, a political adviser for former Gov. Gray Davis, who was
widely known for his fundraising prowess. "It's just supply and demand.
There are too many dollars chasing too few availabilities." And Bruno Cohen,
president and general manager of multiple stations in Sacramento, said
ad rates were likely to climb even higher in the final weeks before the
election. "It's really like the airline business," he said. "If you want
to fly on a particular flight, you really get a good rate early. But if
you have to fly last minute, you'll pay top rate." (SACRAMENTO BEE)
-- Compiled by KOREY CLARK
TOP OF PAGE
Governors
FORMER AL GOV SIEGELMAN INDICTED:
Federal officials last week indicted former ALABAMA Gov. Don
Siegelman (D), his first chief of staff, Paul Hamrick, and the ousted former
chair of Health South on 30 counts of bribery, racketeering and other crimes.
Siegelman is currently seeking to regain his old job after narrowly losing
his re-election bid to current Gov. Bob Riley (R) in 2002. Siegelman served
as governor from January 1999 to January 2003, and was also previously
the Heart of Dixie's lieutenant governor. The indictment claims that the
accused men "established a criminal enterprise in which official actions
were exchanged for bribes." Siegelman quickly responded to the accusations,
releasing a statement that claimed the case is politically motivated, saying
"a few obsessed government officials have spent millions of taxpayers'
dollars in a pathetic attempt to control the election for governor because
they don't trust the people of Alabama enough to let them make that decision
on their own." He also called the charges "absurd" and promised he would
be "proven totally innocent." All three men entered not guilty pleas in
a federal court the day after the indictment. (MOBILE REGISTER)
CONGRESS SAYS BLANCO BEARS BURDEN FOR BODIES:
A Republican-led Congressional House committee said last week
that the bodies of numerous people killed by Hurricane Katrina went uncollected
for more than a week in the New Orleans area because the federal government
was waiting for LOUISIANA Gov. Kathleen Blanco to decide what to do with
them. The accusations came as the committee released 38 pages of e-mails
between the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and the Pentagon,
memos they say indicate that Pelican State morgues were not ready to receive
bodies until Sept. 7, two days after an initial memo complaining about
Blanco's inaction and nine days after Katrina hit the Gulf Coast. The release
came as Blanco was in the process of asking federal officials to pay the
vast majority of the $2.3 billion in damage to state facilities wrought
by hurricanes Katrina and Rita, including at least $125 million to restore
the state-owned Louisiana Superdome in New Orleans. (ABC NEWS, WASHINGTON
POST)
GOVERNORS IN BRIEF: FLORIDA Gov.
Jeb Bush (R) announced his support for a federal measure that would allow
oil drilling in the eastern Gulf of Mexico. The area, 125 miles off the
Sunshine State coast, has been banned from drilling since 2001, when Bush
and others led a fight to keep the rigs out (ORLANDO SUN-SENTINEL). * KANSAS
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius (D) called for a new law that would bar anyone younger
than 16 from getting married in the Sunflower State. Sebelius' call resulted
from an incident earlier this year in which a pregnant 14-year-old NEBRASKA
girl came across state lines to marry her 22-year-old Kansas boyfriend.
The man was later charged with sexual assault in Nebraska. Sebelius said
sexual abusers of children often hide their crime by marrying the victim.
It is currently illegal in Kansas to have sex with anyone under 16, but
it does not apply if the parties involved are married (LAWRENCE JOURNAL-WORLD).
* COLORADO Gov. Bill Owens (R) said he supports a high-tech, non-fatal
fence along the 2,000- mile U.S.-Mexico border similar to what Israel is
building on the West Bank. Owens called such a fence a "humane" way to
deal with the nation's ongoing immigration issues in that region (ROCKY
MOUNTAIN NEWS [DENVER]).
-- Compiled by RICH EHISEN
TOP
OF PAGE
Hot issues
BUSINESS: The CONNECTICUT
Senate unanimously endorses legislation that would require Constitution
State commercial vehicle owners to provide the state with proof of insurance
every six months. Failure to carry insurance would constitute a Class D
felony punishable by up to five years in jail and a $5,000 fine. The bill
motors off to the House (HARTFORD COURANT). * ILLINOIS-based McDonald's
Corp., the world's largest restaurant company, announces that next year
it will begin providing nutritional information on the packaging for most
of its menu. The company has been the target of lawsuits from consumers
that claimed the food served there made them obese (ASSOCIATED PRESS).
* The OHIO House votes 95-0 in favor of a bill that puts a one-year moratorium
on governments using eminent domain laws to take unblighted property for
private development. The measure heads to Gov. Bob Taft (R), who is expected
to sign it into law (DAYTON DAILY NEWS).
CRIME & PUNISHMENT: The KANSAS
Supreme Court rules that the Sunflower State cannot punish illegal underage
sex more severely because it involves homosexuality. The court said harsher
penalties based on such acts are unconstitutional (LAWRENCE JOURNAL-WORLD).
* The NEVADA Supreme Court rules that it is legal to segregate inmates
who are HIV-positive from other inmates. The policy had been challenged
by an AIDS-infected inmate who claimed his disease should not keep him
from being allowed into the prison population (NEVADA APPEAL [CARSON CITY]).
* NEW JERSEY parole officials impose a curfew on more than 2,000 convicted
sexual offenders that requires them to be off the street by 7 p.m. on Halloween
night. Parolees are also not allowed to open their doors to Trick-or-Treaters
or attend Halloween parties, even with their own children (STAR LEDGER
[NEWARK]). * A NEW YORK court rules that police cannot legally conduct
searches that destroy or severely damage a vehicle they have pulled over,
even if the person driving gives their consent to the inspection (POST-STANDARD
[SYRACUSE]).
EDUCATION: The OHIO Senate unanimously
approves HB 79, which would require local school districts to promptly
report allegations of teacher misconduct to state education officials.
The measure graduates to the House (DAYTON DAILY NEWS). * The National
Academy of Sciences and the National Science Teachers Association announce
that unless KANSAS educators reconsider the state's proposed new science
guidelines, they will not allow Sunflower State educators to use their
copyrighted science education materials. The organizations say the new
guidelines overemphasize uncertainties about the theory of evolution and
place too much credence in supernatural phenomenon. A final state decision
on those guidelines is due next month (WASHINGTON POST).
ENVIRONMENT: SOUTH DAKOTA wildlife
officials say they will move ahead with a plan to poison prairie dogs in
one-mile buffer zones on private land that is located next to federal property
in an effort to stop prairie dog encroachment. A similar federal plan for
public lands is being contested in court by both environmentalists -- who
say the plan would kill too many prairie dogs -- and the state, which says
the feds won't kill enough of the critters (RAPID CITY JOURNAL).
HEALTH & SCIENCE: The ILLINOIS
Senate approves a plan from Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D) that would guarantee
state-funded health care coverage for 250,000 uninsured Prairie State children.
The bill moves to the House (CHICAGO SUN-TIMES). * Still in ILLINOIS, the
House overrides a Blagojevich veto of a bill that lowers the legal age
for getting a tattoo from 18 to 21. It moves to the Senate. If approved
there, the measure will be inked into law (CHICAGO TRIBUNE). * The WISCONSIN
Assembly votes to restore limits on how much plaintiffs can receive in
medical malpractice lawsuits. The Badger State Supreme Court tossed the
caps earlier this year. The measure heads now to the Senate (GREEN BAY
PRESS-GAZETTE).
HOMELAND SECURITY: Transportation
officials in WASHINGTON announce that ferries operating in Puget Sound
will provide emergency-preparedness classes and information to the 26 million
people who use the ferry system annually. The information will be provided
in a variety of formats, from training videos on flat-screen TVs to security
classes during ferry crossings (SEATTLE TIMES).
SOCIAL POLICY: A NEW HAMPSHIRE commission
on same-sex unions says it will urge lawmakers not to allow gays to marry,
recognize out-of-state same sex marriages or to establish a domestic partner
registry for couples who cannot legally marry. The commission earlier this
month recommended a constitutional amendment stating that marriage is only
between one man and one woman (BOSTON GLOBE).
POTPOURRI: The PENNSYLVANIA Supreme
Court rules that disciplinary hearings for Keystone State lawyers will
now be open to the public. Previously, details of discipline against lawyers
and judges were made available only after final findings by the high court's
16-member Disciplinary Board and a ruling by the justices (PITTSBURGH POST-GAZETTE).
-- Compiled by RICH EHISEN
TOP OF PAGE
UPCOMING
ELECTIONS
(10/27/2005 - 11/17/2005)
11/08/2005
Georgia Special Election
House
121
11/08/2005 Mississippi
Special Election
House
096
11/08/2005 Missouri
Special Election
House
094, 150
Senate
029
11/08/2005 New Jersey
General Election
Assembly
(All)
11/08/2005 Oklahoma
Special General
Senate
048
11/08/2005 Tennessee
Special Election
House
022
11/08/2005 Texas
Special Election
House
143
11/08/2005 Virginia
General Election
House
(All)
11/14/2005 Connecticut
Special Election
Senate
023
TOP
OF PAGE
|
Once
around the statehouse lightly
WITH FEELING -- AND INTEREST: The
dispute now is 215 years old, but as the Rutland Herald reports, that hasn't
prevented VERMONT from pursuing a resolution. Seems that when the then-independent
nation of Vermont joined the union as the 14th state in 1790, the state
of NEW YORK -- for whatever reason -- charged the Green Mountain folk a
$30,000 "admission fee." Vermonters refer to the tab as "blackmail" because
New York threatened to block Vermont's entry unless the money was paid.
Vermont now wants it back -- with interest -- and a state Supreme Court
justice has joined with a political science professor in an effort to redeem
the cash. Total bill, with interest: $88 million. Chances of collecting:
nil.
JIMMY BUFFETT WOULD NOT BE AMUSED: Catherine
Knoll just wanted to honor a few birds. Robert Jubelirer thought she could
have gone about it with a bit more decorum, given that the venue was the
floor of the PENNSYLVANIA State Senate. Knoll, the state's lieutenant governor
and Senate's presiding officer, invited an Amazon parrot named "Groucho"
to serenade lawmakers. After he finished, Jubelirer, the Senate's ranking
Republican, stomped to the podium and, notes the Philadelphia Inquirer,
reamed Knoll for what he considered an inappropriate distraction. "Groucho"
and a companion were in Harrisburg to help lobby for funding for the National
Aviary, located in Pittsburgh. No word on the kind of performance rendered
by the other avian visitor that day --Patrick the Penguin.
A MATTER OF PLACEMENT. Want to carry
a gun under your jacket within city limits in IDAHO? Sorry, can't. Want
to keep it in the glove compartment of your SUV? Just dandy. This small
split hair, newly litigated under terms set forth in the Gem State Constitution,
is troublesome to law enforcement, reports the Twin Falls Times-News, because
police officers who stop vehicles for traffic violations could be at risk
at the hands of a whacko driver with a gun under his seat. Cops need not
worry about other weapons, however. Although it's legal to conceal a gun,
it's against the law to drive around with knives, slingshots or "other
deadly weapons." Apparently, in Idaho, guns are not considered "deadly."
KEEPING AN EYE ON BLUE-HAIRED LADIES: State
officials in KENTUCKY have declared the Bluegrass State's charitable bingo
games "terrorist free zones." And they plan to keep them that way, thanks
to a $36,300 grant from the federal Department of Homeland Security. According
to the Lexington Herald-Leader, some 1,300 Kentucky organizations are licensed
to raise money through gambling, and the Office of Charitable Gaming insists
that the grant will prevent any of those groups from using their proceeds
to fund terrorist activities. "The potential is there," argued one state
official, citing the fact that $51 million was raised in the state from
charity gaming in 2003. The money will be used to buy laptops and access
to a key law-enforcement database.
TRAFFIC SIGN OF THE WEEK: Comes
courtesy of WISCONSIN'S Madison.com, which reports that a sign on a busy
street in the state capital reads "No Parking, 5:30 PM to 4:00 PM." How
about 4:00 PM to 5:30 PM? Nope. That's rush hour. Your car can be towed.
How about "No Parking At Any Time?" Too confusing.
YOUR NANNY AT WORK: The Chicago
Sun-Times reports that a bill now floating through the ILLINOIS Legislature
would require all Chicago-area public-school students to wash their hands
before eating lunch. Apparently, it is first-of-its-kind legislation. And
last-of-its-kind, one would hope.
CURIOSITY CATS: The new political
insider's newspaper circulating around CALIFORNIA'S capital city, Capitol
Weekly and its Web division "The Roundup," last week unveiled a new offering
-- a searchable database for legislative staff salaries. And was it a popular
addition to their repertoire? As Capital Journal notes, the site recorded
77,412 hits in its first eight hours of operation. Most requested salary
-- Shannon Velayas, senior assistant at Public Safety Committee, with 7,518.
Now, if Capitol Weekly could only figure out a way to charge a fee.
-- By A.G. BLOCK
TOP OF PAGE
In
The Hopper
State Net tracks
tens of thousands of bills in all 50 states and Congress at any given time.
Here's a snapshot of what's in the legislative works:
Number of 2005 prefiles
last week: 227
Number of 2005 Intros
last week: 518
Number of bills enacted/adopted
last week: 462
Number of 2005 prefiles
to date: 36,344
Number of 2005 Intros
to date: 160,743
Number of enacted/adopted
overall in 2005: 39,497
Compiled
By JAMES ROSS | Data current as of 10/27/05 | Source: State Net database
TOP OF
PAGE
|
In case you missed
it: Intelligent Design
In recent years,
many opponents of evolution have been pressuring school boards across the
country to require teaching the theory of intelligent design -- the concept
that life is to complex to have developed without the help of an intelligent
creator --alongside Darwin's theory in science class. Supporters say ID
is based on legitimate science; many teachers and scientists complain it
is a back-door way to force religion into the classroom.
In case you missed it, the
full story can be viewed on our Web site at www.statenet.com
(See
archives under the Resources tab)
TOP OF
PAGE
|
Editor: Rich
Ehisen
Associate Editor: Korey
Clark
Contributing Editor: A.G.
Block
Editorial Advisor: Lou Cannon
Correspondents: Richard Cox (CA),
Steve Karas (CA),
Bruce McKeeman (CA), Linda Mendenhall (IL),
Lauren King (MA) and Ben Livingood (PA)
Design: Richard Hansen, Heather
Conway
Copyright 2005 State Net
ISSN: 1521-8449
|
|